Optimal Pacing Rate for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Purpose

This is a prospective, randomized crossover study. The objective of the study is to determine if a pacing rate of 80 beats per minute (bpm) improves quality of life (QoL) and patient function after 3 months of intervention compared to 3 months of the current standard 60 bpm. The investigators will randomly assign half of the participants to a starting rate of 60 bpm and then switch them to a rate of 80 bpm for 3 months, and vice versa.

Condition

  • Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent

Eligibility

Eligible Ages
Between 18 Years and 90 Years
Eligible Genders
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Age 18 years or older 2. History of persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation 3. Implantation of CRT or conduction system pacing in prior 3 months to 5 years of study start 4. History of intrinsic AVN block or have undergone AVN ablation in prior 3 months to 5 years of study start 5. LVEF ≥ 50% 6. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) >400 pg/mL in the last 24 months 7. Clinical HF diagnosis or NYHA class II or higher 8. Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  1. LVEF <50% 2. Wide QRS (greater than 150ms) 3. Isolated RV pacing 4. Severe valvular disease 5. Severe coronary artery disease as defined by one of the following: 1. ACS or PCI within 1 year 2. Any angina (CCS class 1+) 3. Unrevascularizable severe CAD (>70% stenosis in 1+ major vessels and/or based on functional assessment) 6. ESRD 7. Significant primary pulmonary disease on home oxygen 8. Major orthopedic issues, such as being wheelchair bound and/or unable to perform a six-minute walk test 9. Ventricular ectopy >15% premature ventricular contractions (PVC) 10. End stage cancer diagnosis 11. Life expectancy less than one year 12. Palliative or hospice care 13. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) 14. Uncorrected ventricular septal defect 15. Infiltrative cardiomyopathy (CM) 16. Uncontrolled hypertension as defined by blood pressure >160/100 mm Hg on two measurements ≥15 minutes apart 17. Hemoglobin <7 g/dL 18. Age >90 years old 19. Pregnant or intends to become pregnant

Study Design

Phase
N/A
Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover Assignment
Intervention Model Description
The investigators will randomly assign half of the participants to a starting rate of 60 bpm and then switch them to a rate of 80 bpm for 3 months, and vice versa.
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Arm Groups

ArmDescriptionAssigned Intervention
Experimental
60 bpm, then 80 bpm
Pacing rate of 60 bpm for the first 3 months, then switch to 80 bpm for the next 3 months.
  • Device: Pacing rate of 80 bpm
    Pacing rate of 80 bpm
  • Device: Pacing rate of 60 bpm
    Pacing rate of 60 bpm
Experimental
80 bpm, then 60 bpm
Pacing rate of 80 bpm for the first 3 months, then switch to 60 bpm for the next 3 months.
  • Device: Pacing rate of 80 bpm
    Pacing rate of 80 bpm
  • Device: Pacing rate of 60 bpm
    Pacing rate of 60 bpm

Recruiting Locations

MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
Washington, District of Columbia 20007
Contact:
Sarahfaye Dolman
302-530-1873
Sarahfaye.F.Dolman@medstar.net

MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington, District of Columbia 20010
Contact:
Sarahfaye Dolman
302-530-1873
Sarahfaye.F.Dolman@medstar.net

MedStar Southern Maryland Hospital
Clinton, Maryland 20735
Contact:
Sarahfaye Dolman
302-530-1873
Sarahfaye.F.Dolman@medstar.net

MedStar Heart and Vascular Office at Fairfax
Fairfax, Virginia 22031
Contact:
Sarahfaye Dolman
302-530-1873
Sarahfaye.F.Dolman@medstar.net

More Details

Status
Recruiting
Sponsor
Medstar Health Research Institute

Study Contact

Sarahfaye Dolman
302-530-1873
Sarahfaye.F.Dolman@medstar.net

Detailed Description

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) after atrioventricular node (AVN) ablation for permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) has led to better outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared to pharmacotherapy. Emerging evidence has demonstrated patients with HFpEF may benefit from a higher heart rate compared to standard heart-lowering therapies. The optimal pacing rate for CRT after AVN ablation in persistent AF and HFpEF remains unknown. This is a prospective, randomized crossover study. The objective of the study is to determine if a pacing rate of 80 beats per minute (bpm) improves quality of life (QoL) and patient function after 3 months of intervention compared to 3 months of the current standard 60 bpm. The investigators will randomly assign half of the participants to a starting rate of 60 bpm and then switch them to a rate of 80 bpm for 3 months, and vice versa. Patient mortality and HF hospitalizations will be recorded at each phase. An electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, pacemaker interrogation, BNP and creatinine levels, KCCQ-12, six-minute walk test, and physical activity measure will be obtained at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.